IconSplit
Public Benchmark

Icon sheet extraction benchmark

This benchmark records what automatic extraction found, what a human reviewer expected, and where the tested detector failed. It is designed to make IconSplit's strengths and limits inspectable rather than hiding them behind a single success rate.

Flat icon sheet with twenty-five icons used in the extraction benchmark

Case measurements and verified outputs

Detection was measured on October 17, 2026. The October 30 audit checks stored files, not a new run of the current detector. Detected regions may include text or controls; they are not successful asset counts.

SourceOriginal regionsPrepared regionsManual selections
ChatGPT web16Not cropped8
Gemini web1188

ChatGPT web

Measured: 2026-10-17. Processing snapshot SHA-256: d75b331f5d2a576dba365545a6ee233958e8806e3330c5906468d3793ea1111a

Pale decorative circles remain; manual selections are not automatic successes.

Inspect output dimensions and transparency
  • logo.png: 78 × 69px; 1849 fully transparent pixels, 0 partially transparent pixels.
  • hero.png: 618 × 491px; 110027 fully transparent pixels, 0 partially transparent pixels.
  • files.png: 166 × 168px; 7137 fully transparent pixels, 31 partially transparent pixels.
  • planning.png: 164 × 170px; 6818 fully transparent pixels, 37 partially transparent pixels.
  • messages.png: 165 × 169px; 6918 fully transparent pixels, 40 partially transparent pixels.
  • updates.png: 166 × 165px; 7460 fully transparent pixels, 0 partially transparent pixels.
  • insights.png: 165 × 165px; 7366 fully transparent pixels, 0 partially transparent pixels.
  • security.png: 166 × 166px; 7666 fully transparent pixels, 0 partially transparent pixels.

Folder Repair comparison changes 24 pixels. This is not a visual-quality score.

Gemini web

Measured: 2026-10-17. Processing snapshot SHA-256: d75b331f5d2a576dba365545a6ee233958e8806e3330c5906468d3793ea1111a

Original yields one website container; original folder crop has zero transparent pixels. Prepared JPEG assets retain edge/compression limitations.

Inspect output dimensions and transparency
  • logo.png: 39 × 45px; 1087 fully transparent pixels, 26 partially transparent pixels.
  • hero.png: 292 × 217px; 16371 fully transparent pixels, 0 partially transparent pixels.
  • files.png: 64 × 53px; 1295 fully transparent pixels, 69 partially transparent pixels.
  • planning.png: 57 × 59px; 1107 fully transparent pixels, 4 partially transparent pixels.
  • messages.png: 64 × 56px; 1632 fully transparent pixels, 57 partially transparent pixels.
  • updates.png: 54 × 58px; 1774 fully transparent pixels, 21 partially transparent pixels.
  • insights.png: 63 × 55px; 2073 fully transparent pixels, 9 partially transparent pixels.
  • security.png: 52 × 59px; 1398 fully transparent pixels, 29 partially transparent pixels.

Folder Repair comparison changes 11 pixels. This is not a visual-quality score.

Two samples do not establish platform superiority. Exact image-engine versions are unverified. SVG output traces paths and does not recover original layers. Case artwork is not part of the CC0 icon catalog.

Download full records (JSON) · Output measurements (CSV) · Source and output evidence package

Historical baseline: July 2026

These results were generated from the same browser-side extraction path used by the product and manually reviewed against the visible source icons. Runtime is a local measurement, not a universal speed claim.

FixtureExpectedDetectedRuntimeReviewed outcome
Flat grid2526660 msOne extra region
Hand-drawn grid5049701 msOne missed icon
Translucent glass grid9Not scoredTimed outKnown failure case

Baseline recorded July 11, 2026, using frontend-fast-v1. These historical results have not been rerun against the current detector. Display WebP images below are previews, not the original evaluation inputs. A timeout remains unscored; it is not a current failure-rate claim.

Flat twenty-five icon grid benchmark source

Flat grid

Regular spacing and opaque subjects are the detector's strongest case. The extra region shows why preview and removal remain necessary.

Hand-drawn fifty icon grid benchmark source

Hand-drawn grid

Light strokes, uneven edges, and smaller subjects increase the chance that one icon is merged with background noise or missed.

Translucent glass icon grid benchmark source

Translucent glass grid

Low-contrast transparent boundaries are intentionally kept as a visible failure case. Manual selection can crop them, but clean background removal is not yet reliable.

What is measured

Expected visible icons, returned regions, reviewed false positives or misses, and local processing time. Extraction quality is judged before any manual correction.

What is not measured

The benchmark does not claim universal accuracy, compare unreviewed competitors, or treat processing speed from one machine as a service-level guarantee.

How to reproduce it

Upload each fixture through the homepage, keep automatic detection settings at their defaults, and compare the result list with the visible source icons.

Why preview and manual correction still matter

Automatic extraction is a proposal, not an irreversible export step. A dense or translucent source can create an extra crop, miss a small icon, or include a nearby fragment. IconSplit keeps the detected regions visible so users can remove a false result, repair an edge, or switch to manual selection before exporting.

Related workflows